A few days ago, The Guardian (shock horror) released an article written by Dean Burnett, a Neuroscientist who somehow manages to also work as a (not so funny) comedy writer. In the article, he discusses why Immigration is 'essential', and proceeds to reel off a ton of links trying to back up his pathetically left-wing agenda.
For a start, he is a Neuroscientist not a sociologist, so his opinion on immigration is as valid as anyone else's, secondly he writes for the Guardian which is the most left-leaning daily paper out there, and so the article is always going to reflect what the (middle-class, brain-dead lefty) reader wants to hear.
In any case, you can find the article right here.
Lets just go through some points he raises and counter this blatant rubbish...
At the beginning of the article, he begins by explaining that all humans are the same, and that race doesn't exist at all because genetics doesn't vary that much citing an article from organisation known as the 'Council for Responsible Genetics'. This organisation (shock horror) is a left leaning organisation funded by the Ford Foundation, which itself assists with the pro-migration agenda and overall assimilation of all cultures into one melting pot. Its so left-leaning it doesn't recognise Israel's legitimacy, which is a bit of a bonus I suppose.
Thing is, this idea of race not existing goes against other scientific data which suggests, for instance, that Indo-Europeans and Far-East Asians both have some degree of Neanderthal DNA in them, which according to some reports is as high as 7%. Now obviously, seeing as how different racial groups are able to produce fertile young, this is clearly scientific evidence that we are all indeed the same species, but race is akin to breeds of dog, or the difference between domestic and wild cats. Race, if we needed a proper description for those who will always ask annoyingly what is "race", is the display of different phenotypic variations within a single species.
In all the left's attempts to make any of what I've just said appear racist, they fall into their own trap in insinuating that race isn't something real after all. If it doesn't exist, how can you be 'ist' against it, fool!
Our left leaning chum Burnett then goes on to say how we can take in more people here in the UK because only 2.2% of the country is built upon. Apparently then, land is infinite it doesn't matter that England is already the most crowded country in Europe, and we do not need any space to actually grow our own food on, and especially seeing as immigration is pushing the population up by ten million within the next few decades, and we are only 60% (and declining) self-reliant when it comes to feeding ourselves, perhaps we shouldn't be inviting more people over here to come and live. I mean, surely as a scientist this is common sense you gargantuan cock. We are an island nation, any sign of problems in the world and our shipping industry and we'll be starved to death.
The next point that the author (tries) to make is that immigrants help us economically. I don't really know how he comes to this suggestion seeing as even the link he provides us with states “neither a significant gain nor drain for the public purse” through migrant workers.
Its his insinuation however that our infrastructure and economy is owed to migrants because some companies are owned by foreigners that really gets me, citing an article about how our rail network is owned by foreign companies and investors.
So lets get this straight. We get immigrants here who work for a pittance, I can almost see how that's a good thing, but surely gloating about how this country is so quick to sell off all of our most important industries is the most brainless point you could possibly make on this argument. Blindly accepting globalisation without a second thought is ridiculous.
To top things off, he goes on to say:
"It makes little logical sense in either case. Anyone willing to leave their country of birth, travel thousands of miles and go through the process of gaining citizenship probably has a work ethic that wouldn't settle for £50 a week. And as for taking your jobs, if you lose out on a job to a recently arrived individual from a war torn country who can't speak English, perhaps your own CV needs some serious updating?"
Excuse me!? What a predictably middle-class privileged wanker thing to say, from his safe position as a writer of left-wing twaddle.
Immigrants are as much the victim in this process as are the original inhabitants of this island. The economic benefits are to companies (mainly large ones at that) that are wishing to reduce their wages expenditure, not the fault of any British person who through no fault of their own was born in a country where the Government would rather import thousands of migrant workers instead of actually providing a decent education that would set them up for their working life.
No, its much more profitable if you are a wealthy privileged dick-head, to help your friends in big businesses and simply overlook the social ramifications of forgetting about an entire section of society whilst importing foreign cultures which do not always rub up well with the indigenous one. The sneering attitude pointed at working class people is the most maddening aspect of this entire article.
Next is the subject of 'culture'.
The author begins this section of his bollocks by linking a leftie satire piece about immigration. Great to see that you are actually taking this whole thing seriously, its not like its having a negative effect on thousands of peoples lives here in the UK or anything. Laugh it up you pretentious, cunt. I mean, even the Guardian covered this for fucks sake whilst speaking with a member of the Labour party!
Apparently, Britain has always been a nation of immigrants. According to data in this article that was linked, they postulate that British Bronze age people travelled to Africa, consumed some stuff, then moved back to Britain where they died with African minerals inside their teeth. I'm sorry, but that's seriously unlikely unless they were involved in inter-regional trade, which is quite feasible.
To boot, the usual anti-British 'oh but your ancestors had the British Empire so its ok that we completely change your society because you did the same to our people' kind of shit gets mentioned too, but quite frankly that is getting an incredibly boring defence which I can't be bothered to even get into.
I think I'll leave out the scientific mumbo jumbo under the sub-heading of 'life' in which he is clearly trying to appear more intelligent than he really is by trying to insinuate that anyone who disagrees with him is somehow on the wrong side of science.
On the last sub-heading entitled 'Scapegoat', I finally begin to agree with him to a certain degree. The general public is often goaded into bringing on an anti-migrant stance against the newcomers themselves to the point where it becomes an argument of for or against. Of course this is (if the author truly understood how Imperialism worked and continues to work) divide and conquer, and keeps the attention away from the perpetrators who are fucking both sides over the barrel.
Lets think: you have multi-trillion pound industries who steal resources from places like Africa and leave the inhabitants in war-torn countries living in their own excrement. You have massive corporations moving their manufacturing to developing nations like India and China where they use millions of labourers paid a disgustingly low wage to build shit, poorly produced items for us to buy and waste our money on. Then the migrants who want a better life in said shit-holes come here, and are given jobs at minimum wage to act as modern day slaves whilst dragging the rest of the populations wages down in the process - thus once again, only assisting those wealthiest businessmen who already own Tesco and Next among other massive companies.
Simultaneously, the political class has for a long time now considered white English working-class people as below them, and have done their utmost to destroy them with uncontrolled migration and deliberately poor education. Groups like the Fabian Society which have set out specifically to create a coffee coloured 'untermenchen' bottom feeding class to ensure that their social echelon always remains the privileged few. Its called 'social Darwinism', in case you were wondering, and social engineering is what they are all about.
If this isn't true, why would Labour have flooded us with migrants, and you really have to question this when known English haters like Jack Straw held such high positions of power, too.
The advantage is always the wealthiest few, whilst we argue and bicker about the small details the elite class are rubbing their hands together at the fact that we haven't worked out we've been played for decades.
The end result of all this PC crap is that Britain is about to get absolutely destroyed by massive population increases owed by rampant migration which will be, essentially genocide.
The end result of all this PC crap is that Britain is about to get absolutely destroyed by massive population increases owed by rampant migration which will be, essentially genocide.
So yes, I'am anti-immigration, I'am to a certain degree basing someone's cultural relevance of being British on the colour of their skin or their families ancestral history, but I do not blame migrants for coming here, neither do I hate them. This polarised yes and no argument serves no one but political classes, big businesses and cunts like this self-opinionated author who by some random mistake has been set loose writing for a national newspaper.
No comments:
Post a Comment