Children: Property Of The State

Back to work, cunt!

Just when I thought the '1984' and 'Brave New World' analogies had finally worn thin, here comes Baroness Sally Morgan with her fantastic idea of sending all children over the age of two to school. According to her, this will stop poor children from doing so badly in education, but given that she is a Labourite (who worked with Tony Blair whilst he was in office) this idea stinks to high heaven of an excuse to even further undermine and brainwash the working classes.

This news comes not long after the announcement that free childcare is set to double next year, yet even still, there are still calls from various groups to up this even more (which would, one would assume be tantamount to full-time education anyway.) The argument laid out for the benefits to this system seems to be of the understanding that Mothers can then go and find employment with longer hours (if they can find a job at all,) but at the detriment of society and the family. Ironically of course, a lot of Mothers by working will then lose their benefits anyway and will then have to begin paying taxes on their meagre salaries effectively paying for their child's enforced mind-rape from early development up until the age of eighteen anyway.

On first appearances, you'd be forgiven for believing that these ideas are out of some genuine concern the Government has for hard-up families, but this is a worrying trend that ultimately only ends up making things a whole lot worse. 

For example, years ago it was generally accepted that only the man of the house needed to work and the whole family would essentially rely upon the breadwinner for their upkeep. The feminism movement however (after the backers of feminism successfully used women in factories during the world wars) was all about convincing women that they could work and have the career they always wanted. Feminisms desire to work corresponded with a new marketing shift (such as tobacco companies) which aimed material possession at women to get them wanting their own jobs and thus to aid in the break up of the nuclear family whilst providing various companies with a huge labour boost.

At this point, I'd just like to make it clear that I don't have a problem with women working or having successful careers if that is what they actively choose, but nowadays some women are frowned upon by the child-hating feminist brigade if they choose not to work and stay at home to raise the children (if their family can afford it.) Its this victimisation of anyone that wants a traditional life which is the problem.

Trouble is, with household costs so high these days, both parents often do have to work full time hours, a direct result of inflation which can be partly attributed to the fact that both sexes now work (and therefore the labour is worth less by comparison.) Sending young Mothers back to work early then will simply bring a temporary relief to the overall collective until it becomes the social norm and ultimately a further detriment to us all.

What's interesting to note is that Baroness Morgan was the Minister of State for Women too, more than likely promoting the feminist bullshit we all see on a daily basis.

Disturbingly, throughout all of this shit about 'helping poor children's education' and 'helping poor families' there is very little consideration for the development of the kids themselves. Studies prove time and time again that children who spend time away from their parents and loved ones in nurseries go on to exhibit behavioural or developmental problems, and why wouldn't they? You are messing with thousands of years of natural human behaviour for the sake of a fake economy and a few years more of politically correct crap.

When you take all this information with the knowledge that the State essentially has the controls in place through social services to steal your kid off of you for any reason (and if they do, you are unable to talk about it publicly or protest the courts decision.)

For some reason I can really see David Cameron playing the role of
the child snatcher incredibly well.

Look at this case where a six month old kid was forcibly taken away from the parents because the mother was reported to have a learning difficulty and the father had at some point suffered depression (who hasn't.) Interesting then that mental health is given as an excuse to take children away from parents, won't be long before kids are taken away because of their parents climate change denial, caffeine addiction or even for the mother suffering PMT. Ok, so these are of course silly things, but it proves that anything can be changed and made to look like a mental health issue if needed, especially when the reasons may be a bit more political.

So basically, if you don't send your kid to be entered into the hive mind of the neo-liberal machine, and/or you have political opinions the state doesn't like, your child will be stolen from you and made an orphan. And probably raped by the politicians who indirectly stole your kid in the first place.

This is unfortunately just another step in the wrong direction as is practically everything these days, aimed to take control away from the masses, from families and from individuals.